In the earlier week class we discussed about to check the credibility of a paper by using different source of information.we also got a graph from our class work by giving our views on different sources which are used to find some paper or journal.this graph is given below.
we can see in it that books touch a hike in this graph.but i use the the internet to find my blogs work which is to find two articles.these two articles and proof for it is to be credible are given below.
BioSWR – Semantic Web Services Registry for Bioinformatics
this is the article of my interest because i inserted in biology and their area and also inserted to find its relation with other fields like computer.this article is about to use web service to register data for bioinformatics.
- how i found it.
i found it on the plosone website which i think is a good site for reading something new in every field this web site is quite credible because it is a is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. It is the world’s largest journal by number of papers published. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine.
- when it was written
this website gives the full information about the article like for this
Received: May 6, 2014; Accepted: August 21, 2014; Published: September 18, 2014
- who it was written by
this article is written by
Dmitry Repchevsky, Josep Ll. Gelpi
i think it is a credible evidence because it gives the link to further information about the authors.
- where it was published or what type of ‘thing’ it is
it was published on the plosone website and it is an academic journal.
- what others have said about it (reviews).
it has 902 views and which are increasing rapidly.
- whether others have used the information in their own work (citations)
This type of information is not available on the website.
- how it is written (style)
The style of writing is not available but it gives te information about the editor.
Editor: Yu Xue, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
i also attach the screenshot of the information which is given on the website about thich article which shows its credible.
A Computer-Assisted 3D Model for Analyzing the Aggregation of Tumorigenic Cells Reveals Specialized Behaviors and Unique Cell Types that Facilitate Aggregate Coalescence
This is my second article of interest. this is a 4D computer-assisted reconstruction and motion analysis system, J3D-DIAS 4.1, and applied it to the reconstruction and motion analysis of tumorigenic cells in a 3D matrix.
- how i found it.
i found it on the plosone website which i think is a good site for reading something new in every field this web site is quite credible because it is a is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. It is the world’s largest journal by number of papers published. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine.
The all of the question answers are clear from the screen shots given below because i found that article also from the same website and i think it is credible.screen shots explain everything about it.
The other pics related to article which shows the credibility of the article
Fig 1. 3D culture and image acquisition systems
Fig 2. 3D reconstructions of preparations of the non-tumorigenic cell line MCF-10A.
Fig 3. 3D reconstructions of preparations of the tumorigenic cell line MB-435-Br1.
Fig 4. A “dervish” cell (red) released by an MB-435-Br1 aggregate after 140 hours, moves in a swirling manner along an erratic path through the Matrigel, extending pseudopodia (yellow) from multiple projections.
I think these type of evidences are enough to prove something credible.